Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2892 (ALL)

ANKUR YADAV v. SMT. RINKY YADAV

FAPL/325/2019 · 2026-05-05

Neeraj Tiwari, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL No. - 325 of 2019 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Anwar Ali, learned counsel for appellant and Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he does not want to press the appeal, therefore, it may be dismissed as not pressed, which is not objected by counsel for respondent. 3. Accordingly, first appeal is dismissed as not pressed. May 6, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anwar Ali, Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi, Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Pradeep Kumar Singh (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Ankur Yadav .....Appellant(s) Smt. Rinky Yadav .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad