PDP 904-FA-1430-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1430 OF 2019 Union of India, Through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, Ballard Estate, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. The Estate Investment Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents ... Mr. Ashish Mehta for the Appellant-UoI. Ms. Rujuta Patil i/by Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah for Respondent No.2. Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. DATE : 29th JULY, 2026. P.C. : 1. This is a motion dated 27th July, 2026 tendered by the Appellant- Union of India in the Appeal, for speaking to the minutes of the judgment dated 30th April, 2026 on the ground that the description of Respondent No.2 in the judgment is mentioned as ‘M/s. Mira Salt Work Company’ instead of ‘M/s. Mira Real Estate Developer’. 2. We have perused the cause title of the Appeal filed by the Appellant-Union of India. Respondent No.2 is arrayed in the Appeal as 1 PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2026.07.31 15:10:12 +0530 PDP 904-FA-1430-2019.odt ‘M/s. Mira Salt Work Company’. Though liberty was granted to the Appellant- Union of India to amend the cause title and correct the name as ‘M/s. Mira Real Estate Developer’, it failed to carry out the amendment. 3. In view of the above, the learned Advocate for the Appellant- Union of India, apologetically submits that this is a mistake on the part of the Appellant-Union of India and prays for leave to correct the description of Respondent No.2, today. 4. Leave is granted. Correction be carried out forthwith. Since the Appeal has been decided and disposed off, re-verification is dispensed with. 5. In view of the above, the description of Respondent No.2 in the judgment dated 30th April, 2026 shall be corrected as ‘M/s. Mira Real Estate Developer’. Corrected copy of the judgment be uploaded. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ.] 2