909.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 153 OF 2019 Syed Tamkin @ Tamma S/o. Syed Matin VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ….. Ms. B. B. Gunjal, APP for Respondent – State ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 17.06.2026 PER COURT : 1. None appeared for the Petitioner in the first half. Therefore, the Petition was kept in the second half. Even on the second call, none appeared for the Petitioner. 2. The learned APP for the Respondent - State submits that, the trial has already proceeded, and the case before the Trial Court is at the stage of ‘Evidence Part-heard’. She tenders across the bar the daily status of MCOCA Case No.20/2012, which shows the case status as ‘Evidence Part-heard’. The same is taken on record and marked as ‘Exhibit-1’ for identification. 3. This is the Petition for quashing the said criminal proceedings, which are registered for the offence punishable under Sections 320, 364, 365, 201 and 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under the provisions of MCOCA. Since the trial has commenced and the stage is ‘Evidence Part- heard’, nothing survives in the Petition, and the same stands disposed of as having become infructuous. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/June-2026 1 2026:BHC-AUG:23742-DB