1 977 wp 3673-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3673/2019 Naresh s/o Manik Ishwarkar Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Tahsildar, Mohadi, Dist. Bhandara - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Soniya Thakur, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATED : 23.01.2026 1. This Court on 16.01.2026 passed the following order: “1. In this matter, the notice to engage another Counsel is duly served on the petitioner. However, none present for the petitioner in the matter. 2. Considering the nature of the proceedings, it seems that petitioner is not interested to prosecute the present petition. However, to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner, list this matter on 23.01.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.” 2. Today again, no one present on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Thus, it is clear that petitioner is not interested to prosecute the present petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) R.S. Sahare