Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2121 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
SRI K.V.KRISHNA REDDY, S/O.LATE VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF MANJUNATHA BRICK WORKS, NO.172/1, KUDLU VILLAGE, BOMMANAHALLI POST, BANGALORE.
.. APPELLANT
(BY SRI T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADV. – ABSENT)
AND:
P.PONNUSWAMY, S/O.LAE PERUMAL GOWDAR, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, NO.B2, 5TH CROSS, NEAR BALAJI TALKIES, BALAJI NAGAR, DHARMARAM COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE – 560 029.
.. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI CHANDRAHASA RAI B., ADV. )
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO MODIFY THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT DATED 04.05.2016 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE, IN C.C.NO.21632/2012 AND ALLOW THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT UNDER SECTION 200 CR.P.C. AGAINST THE ACCUSED UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE N.I. ACT AND ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
JUDGMENT
Appellant and his counsel remained absent. There is no representation.
Perused the ordersheet. On 28.06.2019 and 18.07.2019 also there was no representation. Under the said circumstances, it appears that appellant has no interest to prosecute the appeal. Therefore, appeal deserves to be dismissed for non- prosecution. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
PKS