Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2412 (KAR)

SRI VENKATASWAMY v. SMT RATHNAMMA

WP/680/2017 · 2026-09-09

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO. 680/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1.SRI.VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O MUNEERAPPA, 2.SRI.NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNEERAPPA BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF MOORANDAHALLI VILLAGE, ARAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK,-563101 ...PETITIONER/S (BY SRI./SMT : G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) A N D 1. SMT.RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O VENKAESHAPPA, S/O SONNAPPA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SEEPUR VILLAGE, ARAHALLI POST, KOLAR TALUK.-563101 …2 W.P. No. 680/2017 2 2. SMT.BHARATHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, W/O NARAYANASWAMY, D/O SONNAPPA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VADEGERE VILLAGE, MUDUVATTI POST, VOKKELERI HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK.-563101 3. SRI.SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O MUNIVEERAPPA, 4. SMT.CHENNAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O DEVARAPPA, 5. SRI.RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE ERAPPA @ VERAPPA 6. SRI. GOPALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE ERAPPA @ VERAPPA, 7. MUNEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, S/O MUNEERAPPA, 8. SRI.VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, RESPONDENTS- 3 TO 8 ARE RESIDENTS OF MOORANDAHALLI VILLAGE, ARAHALLI POST, KOLAR TALUK.-563101 9. SRI.VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, …3 W.P. No. 680/2017 3 S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, KODIHALLI VILLAGE, ARAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK.-563101 10.SRI.CHENNAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O NARAYANAPPA, D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, CHELLAHALLI VILLAGE, THALAGUNDA POST, VOKKALERI HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK.-563101 …RESPONDENT/S (BY SRI./SMT: S. RAJENDRA, ADV & B.V. KAVITHA, ADV FOR R1 & R2 (VK FILED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 20.07.2016 PASSED ON APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN R.A.NO.104/2011 AND ALSO ORDER ACCEPTING THE COMPROMISE PETITION DATED: 25.2.2014 FILED IN R.A.NO.104/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE KOLAR VIDE ANNEXURE-L & J RESPECTIVELY. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. …4 W.P. No. 680/2017 4 ORDER A week’s time is granted to do the needful, failing which, petition stands dismissed on its own. SD/- JUDGE TYPED BY : JAY CASE WORKER: SHL COMPARED BY: SHL COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR