Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2394 (KAR)

K.R.RAMANNA v. K V VIRUPAKSHAPPA

RSA/1595/2019 · 2026-07-17

V Srishananda

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - RSA No. 1595 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1595 OF 2019 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. 1(a) 2. REVANAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT. SHIVAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S K.R.RAMANNA S/O LATE REVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. K.R.LOKESH S/O LATE REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 4. K.R.SURESH S/O LATE REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. K.R.SIDDESH S/O LATE REVENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 5. K.R.JAYAMMA W/O SHIVALINGAPPA, D/O LATE REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P H., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - RSA No. 1595 of 2019 AND: 1. K V VIRUPAKSHAPPA S/O LATE VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. K.V.SHIVAMURTHAPPA S/O LATE VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BOTH ARE AGRICULTURITS, R/O KADAJJI VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK & DISTRICT - 577 002. 3. K.R.NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O NALAVAGALU VILLAGE, RANIBENNUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 110. 4. K.R.LAKSHMANA S/O LATE REVANAPPA, AGRICULTURIST, R/O KADAJJI VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK & DISTRICT - 577 002. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC, SEEKING CERTAIN RELEIFS. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER When the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of appellants. - 3 - RSA No. 1595 of 2019 The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for third time. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of May 2023. It's been four years. So far, office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections and appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8