THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC v. SHRI.IRAYYA PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMATH
WP/113848/2019 · 2026-06-04
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 2380 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 2380 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
WP No. 113848 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 113848 OF 2019 (L-ID) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC CHIKKODI DIVISION, RETD.BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, GADAG DIVISION, GADAG.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI.IRAYYA PANCHAKSHARAYYA HIREMATH R/O: MAHAJANA PLOT, NO.49, BASAVANAGAR, TQ : ATHANI, DIST : BELAGAVI.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO:- ISSUE A WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER INCLUDING THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 29/09/2016 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.41/2014 BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, BELAGAVI COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
Digitally signed by John Doe
- 2 -
WP No. 113848 of 2019
ORDER
On 09.03.2020 the following order was passed:
“The petitioner shall comply with the office objections within a period of two weeks from today, subject to the condition that if the office objections are not complied within such period, the petition shall be listed for dismissal for default.”
Till today office objections have not been complied with.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is also absent.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE
SSP