Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2370 (HP)

Thothi Ram v. STATE OF HP

CWPOA/4329/2019 · 2026-09-15

Ranjan Sharma

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.4329 of 2019 Decided on: 15.09.2026. _______________________________________________________________ Thothi Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. ....Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner, Thothi Ram has come up before this Court seeking the following relief(s): (a) Direct the respondents to grant the work-charge status to the petitioner after completion of 9 years service with 240 days w.e.f 01.01.1999 in the pay scale of rs 2520-4140/- with all other allowance applicable to the cadre post including difference of arrears w.e.f 01.01.1999 to 31.08.2005 alongwith 12 % interest. (b) Direct the respondents to pay the gratuity and service gratuity under the CCS Pension Rules, 1972 to the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.1999 to 31.08.205 and leave encashment after fixed his lastly salary on regular basis alongwith interest @ 12 % per annum.” 2. Upon listing of the case today Learned Counsel informed this Court that petitioner is no more in the land of living. He further submits that none of his legal heirs, as orally instructed, intent to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement taken on record] 3. In view of the above intervening events, the instant petition is closed. In aforesaid terms, the writ petition and all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September, 15, 2026 (Anita)