IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No.393 of 2019 Decided on: 21.08.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ganshyam Dutt ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of instructions dated 05.03.2026 and copy of office order dated 27.02.2026, passed by the Commissioner Industries, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 27.02.2026, reveals that the memorandum dated 19.06.2010 issued to the petitioner together with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom including the office order dated 26.08.2010 appointing the Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer, has been withdrawn and the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 disciplinary proceedings initiated pursuant thereto have been closed. 3. In view of the aforementioned facts, the petition instituted by the petitioner has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 21 st August , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge