IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1685 of 2019 a/w CWP No. 1767 of 2019 Decided on 19.8.2026. 1. CWP No. 1685 of 2019 Anil Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission. …Respondent. ……………………………………………………………………………………… 2. CWP No. 1767 of 2019 Rajneesh Chauhan ...Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission. …Respondent. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Peeyush Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, in CWP No. 1685/2019. None for the petitioner in CWP No. 1767/2019. For the respondents: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Shivani Priya, Advocate, in both the petitions. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of subsequent development, the petitions have been rendered infructuous. 2 2. In view of above, the petitions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 19, 2026 (Guleria)