ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. RAJESHWARI TYAGI @ RAJESH AND OTHERS
CMP/13321/2026 · 2026-06-22
Virender Singh
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 2261 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 2261 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd. vs. Rajeshwari Tyagi @ Rajesh & ors. FAO (MVA) No. 514 of 2019 22.6.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Dhanwanti,
Advocate,
for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 and 5. CMP No. 13321 of 2026 The present application has been filed in decided matter, i.e. FAO No. 514 of 2019, which has been decided, by this Court, on 3.12.2025. As per the application, respondent No.1 Rajeshwari Tyagi has expired on 4.5.2025, during pendency of the present appeal, leaving behind her LRs, i.e. respondents No. 2 and 3. On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to delete the name of respondent No. 1, so that the record can be completed. In order to demonstrate the aforesaid fact, the legal heir certificate has been annexed with the application, as Annexure A-1. As per this document, Rajeshwari Tyagi is succeeded by Ravinder Kumar Tyagi and Gagan Tyagi, respondents No. 2 and
3. Considering the said fact, name of respondent No. 1 is ordered to be deleted from the
array of parties. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections in the memo of parties. The application is, thus, disposed of. CMP No. 13322 of 2025 By way of present application, a prayer has been made to release the amount of compensation, awarded in favour of respondents. As per the present application, initially, there were three respondents, namely Rajeshwari Tyagi, Ravinder Kumar Tyagi and Gagan Tyagi, however, since respondent No. 1 Rajeshwari Tyagi has expired, and vide order of even date, passed in CMP No. 13321 of 2026, her name has been ordered to be deleted. Considering the said fact and in view of no objection made by learned vice counsel for the non- applicants, the amount of compensation is ordered to be released in favour of respondents No. 2 and 3 (applicants herein) and the same is apportioned equally amongst them, as name of respondent No. 1 has been ordered to be deleted. The amount, so released, shall be remitted to the saving bank accounts of the applicants, particulars of which have been mentioned in para-5 of the application. The application is, thus, disposed of.
CMP No. 13323 of 2026 The application is allowed with a direction to the applicant to do the needful, as and when, directed by the Court to do so. The application is, thus, disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge
June 22, 2026 (kalpana)