Rajeshwari Tyagi @ Rajesh & Ors. Vs  Ram Swaroop Khanna & Ors. FAO (MV) No. 540 of 2019 22.06.2026 Present: Ms. Dhanwanti Devi, Advocate, for the appellants/applicants. Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2/non­applicants. Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 3/non­applicant. CMP No. 13324 of 2026 By way of the present application, a prayer has been   made   for   deletion   of   name   of   appellant   No.   1, namely Smt. Rajeshwari Tyagi @ Rajesh, from the array of parties, in a decided matter, which has been decided by this Court on 03.12.2025. The application has been moved on the ground that after the decision of FAO No. 540   of   2019,   Smt.   Rajeshwari   Tyagi   has   expired   on 04.05.2025, leaving behind appellants No. 2 and 3 as her   legal   representatives. The   application   has   been moved to update the record. In   order   to   buttress   their   contentions, appellants No. 2 and 3, have placed on record the death certificate of deceased Rajeshwari Tyagi, issued by the competent authority. Since, the deceased Rajeshwari Tyagi has been succeeded by Ravinder Kumar Tyagi and Gagan Tyagi i.e. appellants No. 2 and 3 and there is no objection of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the application   under   consideration   is   allowed   and   the name of Rajeshwari Tyagi is ordered to be deleted from the array of parties. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. CMP No. 13325 of 2026 By  way  of present  application, a  prayer  has been   made   to   release   the   amount   of   compensation, awarded in favour of respondents. As per the present application, initially, there were   three   applicants,   namely   Rajeshwari   Tyagi, Ravinder Kumar Tyagi and Gagan Tyagi, however, since applicant No. 1 Rajeshwari Tyagi has expired, vide order of even date, passed in CMP No. 13324 of 2026, her name has been ordered to be deleted. Considering  the  said fact   and in  view   of  no objection   made   by   learned   vice   counsel   for   the   non­ applicants, the amount of compensation is ordered to be released in favour of applications No. 2 and 3 and the same is apportioned equally amongst them, as name of applicant No. 1 has been ordered to be deleted. The amount,   so  released,   shall  be   remitted   to  the  saving bank accounts of the applicants, particulars of which have been mentioned in para 5 of the application. The application is, thus, disposed of. CMP No. 13326 of 2026 The application is allowed with a direction to the applicant to do the needful, as and when directed by the Court to do so. The application is, thus, disposed of. ( Virender Singh ) Judge 22nd June, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)