Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 924 of 2019
Decided on: June 19 , 2026
Dhani Ram & Ors.
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
...Respondents
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Ms. Meghna Keshwa, Advocate, vice
Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3/State.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 4/Ambuja Cement Ltd.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original petitioner has died and she has instructions not to proceed with the matter any further, therefore, this writ petition be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, June 19 , 2026 (PK)
Judge
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.