IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2290 of 2019 Decided on: 20th May, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sudarshana Devi …..Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation Shimla and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a review under Section 402-A of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. His request is accepted. 2. In view of the submission made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 petitioner to file a review petition within a period of four weeks from today, whereafter, the concerned authority to consider the same on merits without referring the delay. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 20, 2026 Judge Mukesh