Ravinandan Kaur vs. State of H.P. & Ors. CWPOA No.4602 of 2019 05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishwa Deep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents- State. CMP-T No.49 of 2026 By way of present application, the applicant/petitioner is seeking amendment to the writ petition. This Court had issued the notice in the application on 10.03.2026 and the respondents were granted three weeks time to file reply to the application. Thereafter, again time was granted on 07.04.2026, but no reply has been filed by the respondents. The applicant/petitioner has prayed that during the pendency of the petition, in the year 2014, the services of the petitioner were ordered to be terminated orally and as such he wants to seek amendment to the petition by incorporating that fact inasmuch as an oral termination of the petitioner is violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has also sought amendment in the prayer clause. Since the cause of action had accrued in favour of the applicant/petitioner after the institution of the writ petition inasmuch as no prejudice is going to be caused to the respondents in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. The respondents will get an opportunity to file the reply to the amended writ petition. Keeping in view the above facts the instant application is allowed and the amendment sought in the application is ordered to be incorporated in the writ petition. The application is accordingly disposed of. Amended writ petition, appended with the application be placed at an appropriate place. CWPOA No.4602 of 2019 Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply to the amended writ petition. List on 16.06.2026. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 05th May, 2026 Judge (Anurag)