Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No.635 of 2019 Decided on : 04.05.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Bachittar Singh
...Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. None for respondent No.3. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening developments and efflux of time, the issue raised in the present petition has become infructuous and as such he does not want to press the present petition.
2. Accordingly, in view of the statement of counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand
disposed of. 04 th May
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?