IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4268 of 2019 Decided on: 4th May, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/s Anrose Pharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Senior Advocate with Ms. Godawari, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already taken recourse to the alternate remedy available to the petitioner for the redressal of its grievances raised in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition be closed. In view of above and taking note of the fact that the petitioner has taken recourse to the statutory remedy 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 available to it in law, the present writ petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 04, 2026 Judge Mukesh