IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3008 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8711 of 2017 ====================================================== Braj Bhushan Sharma S/o Late Ram Govind Sharma resident of near Jail Road, Shahpur, Govind Complex, P.S. Shahpur, District Gorakhpur Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Patna, namely Sri Deepak Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner 2. The Principal Secretary Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Arun Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner 3. The Engineer in Chief (Madhya) cum the Disciplinary Authority Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Patna, namely Ram Pukar Ranjan, Late Laxmi Baitha 4. The Officer on Speical Duty Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Gajanan Mishra, Son of not known to the petitioner 5. The Deputy Secretary Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Jiut Singh, Son of not known to the petitioner 6. The Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Balmiki Nagar, District West Champaran, Bihar, Patna namely Sri Dinesh Choudhary, Son of not known to the petitioner 7. The Exeuctive Engineer Main Western Canal Division, Balmiki Nagar, District West Champaran, Bihar, Patna namely Md. Abdul Zamil, Son of not known to the petitioner 8. Sri Ram Pukar Ranjan S/o Late Laxmi Baitha at present posted as Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department,Govt. of Bihar, Patna, resident of Mohalla 4B, Khushi Villa, P.s.- Budha Colony, District Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, A.C. to G.P.7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Shri Shubham Prakash, the learned Advocate appears and submits that on the instruction given by the learned Advocate on record namely Shri Prabhat Ranjan, he be Patna High Court MJC No.3008 of 2019(3) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. 3. The learned counsel for the State does not object to the same. 4. Permission, so sought for, is accorded. 5. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sanjay/- (Ritesh Kumar, J.) U