Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4204 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3940 of 2013 ====================================================== Sindhu Kumari Wife of Chiranjeevi Kumar Sinha Resident of Village and P.O.- Dhurgaon, P.S.-Ekanger Sarai, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Mr. Atul Prasad Son of not known to petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Anand Kishore Son of Not known to petitioner, the Commissioner Patna Division At Patna.
4. Mr. Alok Kumar Son of not known to petitioner, the Director, Directorate of I.C.D.S., Patna.
5. Mr. Yogendra Singh Son of not known to petitioner, the District Magistrate Nalanda District- Nalanda.
6. Mrs. Rashmi Rani Wife of not known to petitioner, the District Program Officer Nalanda District- Nalanda.
7. Mrs. Rubi Kumari Wife of not known to petitioner, the Child Development Program Officer, Ekangarsarai Block- Ekangarsarai District- Nalanda.
8. Mr. Ramautar Singh Son of not known to petitioner, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Dhurgaon Block- Ekangarsarai District- Nalanda.
9. Mr. Sanjo Devi Wife of not knwon to petitioner, the Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Dhurgaon Block- Ekangarsarai District- Nalanda.
10. Kumari Anju Wife of Shashikant Resident of Village and P.O.- Dhurgao, District- Nalanda.
11. Soni Kumari Wife of Umesh Prasad Resident of Village and P.O.- Dhurgao, District- Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Anis Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA 7) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court MJC No.4204 of 2019(6) dt.13-08-2026 2/2
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present petition, the order dated 07.12.2017 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 3940 of 2013 has been complied with and hence the present petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
ashutosh/- (Raj Kumar, J) U