Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2038 (PAT)

PINTU KUMAR v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./35391/2019 · 2026-07-28

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35391 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2048 Year-2017 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Pintu Kumar Son of Ram Gulal Roy Resident of Village-Hakimabad, P.S.-Samas- tipur (Muffasil), District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Jigyasa Kumari W/o Pintu Kumar Resident of Village-Hakimabad, P.S.-Samastipur (Muffasil), District-Samastipur, at present D/o Bhola Roy, Resident of Village- Rahimpur Rudauli, P.S.-Samastipur (Muffasil), District-Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2026 Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the peti- tioner, at the very outset, prays for withdrawal of the application on account of it being infructuous. 2. Prayer is allowed. This application stands dis- missed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all the issues as has been raised herein before the learned trial Court at an appropri- ate stage. 3. Application is dismissed as having become in- fructuous. Smriti/ Supratim/- (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U