Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2016 (PAT)

SUMIT RAJ v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

CR. MISC./35354/2019 · 2026-07-28

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35354 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-530 Year-2017 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sumit Raj, Son of Madan Prasad Resident of Village - Sarswati nagar, Road No.03, Bairiya, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur, State - Bihar, at Present resident of Flat No.103, topaz Building, Srinath Road Garden, Manipita, P.S.- Telco, Dist.- Singhbhum, State.- Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Pallavi Ranjan @ Kumari Pallavi Ranjan, D/o Satyendra Kumar , W/o Sumit Raj, At Present resident of Mohalla- Har-Har Mahadeo, Kanhauli, North Form Sanskrit College, Malighat, P.S.- Mithanpura, Dist.- Muzaffarpur, State Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2026 The case was initially called at 02:15 pm but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, again it was repeatedly called in between 03:35 pm to 03:45 pm but none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State is present. 3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution. saurabh.kr/ prakash- (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U T