Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 1986 (PAT)

SATENDRA PRASAD SINGH v. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE C. B. I. PATNA

CR. MISC./35341/2019 · 2026-07-24

Rana Vikram Singh

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35341 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2015 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Satendra Prasad Singh, Son of Krishna Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Panchmukhi Nagar, Gaya Road, Bhadauni, Police Station-Nawada, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The Union of India through the C. B. I., Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner very fairly submits that in view of the nature of allegations, he may be permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to raise all the grounds which have been raised in the instant application before the learned Trial Court at an appropriate stage by filing an Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35341 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 appropriate application. 2. Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State is also present. 3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, this application is disposed off with the liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court at an appropriate stage, raising all the grounds taken in the instant application and the learned Trial Court is directed to consider the same, whenever an application is filed on behalf of the accused person, and decide the same purely on the merit of it without being prejudiced, in any manner, by the order of this Court. Rakesh/Praveen-II (Rana Vikram Singh, J) U T