Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 1963 (PAT)

MUNNA DEVI v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./79793/2019 · 2026-07-22

Sandeep Kumar

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79793 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2018 Thana- SC/ST District- Jamui ====================================================== MUNNA DEVI W/O Tuna Raavidas R/O Maura P.S. Gidhore, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Horil Yadav S/O Bisun Yadav R/O Maura P.S. Gidhore, District- Jamui. 3. Gaina Yadav son of Horil Yadav R/O Maura P.S. Gidhore, District- Jamui. 4. Dhananjay Yadav Son of Horil Yadav R/O Maura P.S. Gidhore, District- Jamui. 5. Manjay Yadav son of Horil Yadav R/O Maura P.S. Gidhore, District- Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 22-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Opposite Party nos. 2 to 5 vide order dated 23.04.2019 passed by learned A.D.J. 1st, Jamui in Jamui SC/ST P.S. Case No. 30 of 2018 registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354(B), 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3(i)(r)/ 3(2)(v)(a)/ 3(i)(w) of the SC/ST Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Opposite parties are alleged to have assaulted the petitioner and her family members. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79793 of 2019(3) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case warranting cancellation of bail, hence, no ground is made out for interference with the impugned order passed by the court below. 5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T