Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 1562 (GAU)

Millo Pugang v. THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors.

WP(C)/459/2019 · 2026-08-23

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014042019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/459/2019 Millo Pugang Surveyor of works (Electro MEchanical) office of the chief engineer (Western Zone) Department of Hydro Power, Itanagar Mobile No. 9436643782 VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:THE COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Occupation : HYDRO POWER DEVELOPMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR 3:Rubu Opo Age: 0 Occupation : S/o Late Rubu Tana a Resident of Village Tajang (Lempia) PO and PS Ziro District Lower Subansiri Arunachal Pradesh 4:Gumto Ete Age: 0 Occupation : Executive Engineer (Electro Mechanical) Pangin Hydro Power Division Department of Hydro Power Development PO and PS Pangin Dist. Siang Page No.# 2/2 Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Kamal Saxena, H K Jamoh,M Pertin Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), 1 P K Tiwari, Sr. Advocate,I Chowdhury, Sr. Advocate,Taja Garam BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 24.08.2026 Mr. H. K. Jamoh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, as well as Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel for the private respondent, are present. It is noticed that the present petition pertains to a claim for promotion to the post of Superintending, which is pending since 2019. It appears that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant