Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010185482019 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5790/2019 HANNAS ALI S/O- AFAZUDDIN, R/O- VILL- TENGAGURI KACHARIGAON, P.S- LAHARIGHAT, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782127 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MIN OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI- 110001 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NRC ASSAM 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA G S ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781005 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGAON P.O- AND P.S- MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105 6:THE FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL NO.2 MORIGAON ASSAM DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105 7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) MORIGAON P.O AND P.S- MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105 8:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE LAHARIGHAT POLICE STATION P.O- LAHARIGHAT DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 78212 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH, MR M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, NRC,SC, F.T,SC, ELECTION COMMISSION. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 05.05.2026 (S. K. Medhi, J) Heard Ms. D. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, NRC & FT; Shri M. Islam, learned counsel Page No.# 3/3 appearing on behalf of Shri A. I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, ECI whereas Ms. R. B. Bora, learned State Counsel. The present challenge is against an order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the learned Foreigners’ Tribunal (2nd), Morigaon in FT Case No. 32/2017 (Police reference FT Case No. 62/2017 dated 12.09.2017) declaring the petitioner to be a foreigner of post 1971 stream. The matter is pending at the stage of issuance of notice since the year 2019. Ms. Ghosh, the learned counsel has fairly submitted that the client is not in touch and therefore, it would be difficult for her to pursue this matter. In view of the aforesaid submission, the case is closed. It is however made clear that in case the petitioner wishes to pursue this case, he may approach this Court with an appropriate application. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant