SARIF AHMED @ SARIF UDDIN v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
WP(C)/4920/2019 · 2026-04-27
Sanjay Kumar Medhi, Shamima Jahan
Writ Petition (Civil)body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 1476 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 1476 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154282019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4920/2019 SARIF AHMED @ SARIF UDDIN S/O ABDUL NOOR @ BATUL ALI, VILL.BANDARKONA, B2, P.S.
PATHERKANDI, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788723 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME, NEW DELHI, INDIA 2:THE FOREIGNER REGISTRATION OFFICER NAGAON GOVT. OF INDIA HAIBARGAON NEAR ADP COLLEGE NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782002 3:THE STATE COORDINATOR OF NRC FIRST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA GUWAHATI SHILLONG ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-05, ASSAM 4:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (B) ASSAM, SRIMANTAPUR BHANGAGARH KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI-32 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 6:THE MEMBER FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL KARIMGAN Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N BARMAN, MR. J BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, ECI,SC, NRC
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 28.04.2026 (S. K. Medhi, J)
Heard Shri N. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri J. Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, NRC & FT; Shri N. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri A. I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, ECI and Shri P. Sarma, learned State Counsel. Shri Barman, learned counsel has submitted that in spite of his best efforts, no contact could be made with the client. He has also submitted that so far as the father of the petitioner is concerned for whom another writ petition has been filed, the said father, Abdul Noor has passed away. He, accordingly, submits that he will not be in a position to continue with this case in absence of any instructions. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take steps, if so advised.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant