Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010197832019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : I.A.(Civil)/3681/2019 JIBAN DEY S/O LATE JUGAL KISHORE DEY R/O VILL. DHOPERTOL P.O. AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 VERSUS LAL MOHAN DAS S/O LATE BIDESHI DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 2:RUDAL DAS S/O SRI LAL MOHAN DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 3:CHINIRAM DAS S/O SRI LAL MOHAN DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM Page No.# 2/4 DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 4:DILIP KUMAR DAS S/O SRI LAL MOHAN DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 5:ROHIT DAS S/O SRI LAL MOHAN DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 6:RAJU DAS S/O SRI RUDAL DAS R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 7:SWAPAN SARKAR S/O LATE BINOD LAL SARKAR R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 8:SAMAR SARKAR S/O LATE BINOD LAL SARKAR R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN 783345 9:SWAPAN SARKAR S/O LATE BINOD LAL SARKAR R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 10:SAMAR SARKAR S/O LATE BINOD LAL SARKAR R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 11:DIPAK SARKAR S/O LATE NANDALAL SARKAR R/O VILL. PACHAGARH P.O.AND P.S. FAKIRAGRAM DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN 783345 ------------ Advocate for : MR. M K SHARMA Advocate for : appearing for LAL MOHAN DAS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 12.02.2026 Heard Mr. M.K. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. Zaman, learned counsel for the respondents. This I.A has been preferred under Order IX Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the CPC for setting aside the order dated 25.10.2017, passed in RSA No. Page No.# 4/4 228/2005 whereby the same was dismissed for default for non-prosecution. The delay in preferring the present application is condoned today in IA (Civil) No. 3680/ 2019. It is submitted that the said appeal was dismissed due to non-appearance of the learned counsel for the applicant of which the petitioner had no knowledge. Having regard to the averments made in the instant application, the leaned counsel for the applicant has prayed for setting aside the order dated 25.10.2017 passed in RSA No. 228/2005 and accordingly, the same is set aside and the appeal is restored to file at its original stage at which the same was dismissed for non-prosecution. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant