1 (WPS No. 3623 of 2019) CGHC010157422019 2026:CGHC:36539 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3623 of 2019 1 - Bhawani Prasad Dhruv S/o Shri Basawanji Dhruv Aged About 65 Years Occupation- Retired Head Master, R/o Vill. Khairi, Post Khaida, Police Station- City Kotwali, Baloda Bazar, Disrtict- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Dy Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Member Secretary, Pension Nirakaran Samiti, General Administration Department, Atal Ngar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Senior Accounts Officer Office Of Accountant General (Accounts And Pension), Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Zero Point, Balodabazar Road, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Block Education Officer Block- Baloda Bazar, Disrtict- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.08.19 11:09:45 +0530 2 (WPS No. 3623 of 2019) For Petitioner :- Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1, 2,4 & 5/State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, PL For Respondent No.3 :- Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17.08.2026 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging order dated 28.09.2018 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No.2 and to direct the respondent authorities to pay the amount of Rs.7,05,813/- to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant matter is pertaining to the arbitrary calculation of GPF amount and prays that this matter be referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute involved in the present case. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would oppose. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and gone through the material available on record with utmost circumspection. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that disputed questions of facts are involved in the present case, therefore, this 3 (WPS No. 3623 of 2019) matter is referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute. The committee is directed to decide the case of the petitioner after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties. 6. Office of Advocate General is directed to supply one copy of this petition along with necessary documents to the said committee. 7. With the aforesaid observation(s), this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!