1 (WPS No. 9253 of 2019) CGHC010369732019 2026:CGHC:36540 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9253 of 2019 1 - Radheshyam Thawait S/o Ramrai Thawait Aged About 63 Years R/o Village - Kotmisonar, Tahsil And Police - Station - Akaltara District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its The Secretary The School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Assistant Commissioner ( Audiwasi Vikas Vibhg Korba ) District - Korba Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer Korba District - Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - The Accountants General The Employee Of Provident Fund Office Chhattisgarh Zero Point Balodabazar Road Post - Office - Vidhansabha Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Mr. Ravi Maheshwari, Advocate For Respondent No.4 :- Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.08.19 11:09:45 +0530 2 (WPS No. 9253 of 2019) SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17.08.2026 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but inaction of the respondent authority for not paying the retiral dues to the tune of Rs.2,22,695/- of GPF to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant matter is pertaining to the arbitrary calculation of GPF amount and prays that this matter be referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute involved in the present case. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would oppose. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and gone through the material available on record with utmost circumspection. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that disputed questions of facts are involved in the present case, therefore, this matter is referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute. The committee is directed to decide the case of the petitioner after affording 3 (WPS No. 9253 of 2019) due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties. 6. Office of Advocate General is directed to supply one copy of this petition along with necessary documents to the said committee. 7. With the aforesaid observation(s), this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!