SMT. VIDYA SAHU v. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED
WPS/102/2019 · 2026-08-04
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 1340 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 1340 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 WPS No. 102 of 2019
CGHC010006682019
2026:CGHC:34075
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 102 of 2019 Smt. Vidya Sahu D/o Late Shri Kartikram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gayatri Nagar Rajgamar SECL P.S. Rajgamar (Balconagar) Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh Presently Residing At C/o R.K. Medical Stores Post And Teshil Nawagarh District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus
1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Head Quarter Seepat Road Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
2. Chief General Manager SECL Raigarh Area Sub Area Barod Mines Tehsil Raigarh District Korba Chhattisgarh.
3. General Manager (MINING) SECL Rajgamar Sub Area Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
4. Deputy Personnel Manager SECL Rajgamar Sub Area Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate. For Respondents :- Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board 05.08.2026
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 27.09.2018, whereby, petitioner’s application for grant of compassionate appointment rejected. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH
2 WPS No. 102 of 2019
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite the
order passed by the Succession Court in favour of the petitioner, her case for compassionate appointment has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the case of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their submission made herein above and gone through records minutely.
5. Admittedly, respondents has rejected to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner vide order dated 27.09.2018 (Annexure P/1), however, the Succession Certificate (Annexure P/3) has already been granted in favour of petitioner herein/ Vidya Sahu and she has been held to be daughter of Kartik Ram Sahu. In that view of the matter, order dated 27.09.2018 is quashed and the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass fresh order within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge Ankit