Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 1324 (CHH)

SNIGDHA PATTNAIK v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/332/2019 · 2026-07-23

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 WPS No. 332 of 2019 CGHC010403002018 2026:CGHC:31660 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 332 of 2019  Snigdha Pattnaik D/o Shri Kanak Bihari Pattnaik, Aged About 35 Years, Working As State Consultant (M & E), National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Chhattisgarh, National Health Mission, Chhattisgarh, IVth Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Complex, Sector-27, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, Near Udyog Bhawan Metro Station Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi 110011. 2. National Health Mission Chhattisgarh, Through Its State Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Room No. S4-10, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Chhattisgarh, IVth Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Complex, Sector-27, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Sundar Lal Sahu, Advocate, appears on behalf of Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate. For Respondents No.2 & 3 :- Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH 2 WPS No. 332 of 2019 SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24.07.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he may be permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith supportive documents before the concerned respondents authorities, which may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file aforesaid representation alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to consider and decide petitioners’ said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit