Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.1 of 2 IN WPS-156-2019
2026:CGHC:181
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 156 of 2019 Ishwar Nande S/o Shri Kartik Ram Nande Aged About 30 Years R/o Village - Odekera, P.S. And Tahsil Pusaur District Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Raigarh , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sub Division Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pusaur, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Project Officer Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee, Janpad Panchayat Pusaur, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner
: Mr. Manoj K. Sinha, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 02.01.2026
1. Heard. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner was terminated from the post of Rojgar Sahayak by order dated 12.06.2012 (Annexure-P/3), SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
Page No.2 of 2 IN WPS-156-2019 against which, he preferred an appeal before the Additional Collector and same also stood rejected on 01.07.2013 (Annexure-P/01). Feeling aggrieved, this writ petition has been preferred with a delay of about 06 years on 05.01.2019. The only explanation which is sought to be given in Para-07 of the writ petition is that since the petitioner has submitted representation to the respondent-Collector, Raigarh and direction has also been issued from time to time to the Janpad Panchayat, Pusaur, but till date no any information with respect to the petitioner has been given. However, a careful perusal of the record would show that the last representation was made by the petitioner on 06.12.2014 (Annexure-P/09). As such, the delay of about six years in filing this writ petition against the order dated 01.07.2013 has not been explained satisfactorily.
Even otherwise, after passing of the order dated 01.07.2013, though the respondent No.02 issued various letters to the SDO, Raigarh and CEO, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh vide Annexure-P/06 & P/07 to enquire into the matter of the petitioner herein, but fact remains that the petitioner failed to challenge order dated 01.07.2013 before any higher forum or before this Court for such a long time. 3. Accordingly, the present petition suffers from delay and latches and same is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. s@if Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge