1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8875 of 2019 Chudamani Yadav S/o. Nirakar Yadav Aged About 43 Years Working As Cluster Academic Co-Ordinator, Kilkila, Block- Patthalgaon, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector And Mission Director Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District-Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Block Education Officer/block Resource Center Co-Ordinator Block-Patthalgaon, District-Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Ujjwal Choubey, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 28.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. In this writ petition, by impugned order dated 10.10.2019 (Annexure-P/01), the petitioner has been directed to work on his original post of Teacher at Government Pre-Middle School, Kilkila, Patthalgaon, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is bad, illegal and arbitrary and, therefore the same is liable to be SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 set aside. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that since the petitioner was already holding his substantive post of Teacher and he was given additional charge of Cluster Academic Coordinator at Kilkila Centre, therefore, he cannot claim to hold the post of Cluster Academic Coordinator at Kilkila Centre as a matter of right. Therefore, the present writ petition deserves to be dismissed. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival submissions made herein above and went through the record with utmost circumspection. 6. In the case at hand, a careful perusal of the record would show that petitioner’s substantive/original post is Teacher, which post he was holding and do work at the relevant point of time and, thereafter, he was given additional charge of Cluster Academic Coordinator at Kilkila Centre and, by impugned order dated 10.10.2019 (Annexure-P/01), he has been relieved from the additional charge of Cluster Academic Coordinator, Kilkila Centre and directed to work on his substantive/original post of Teacher, at Government Pre-Middle School, Kilkila, Patthalgaon, District-Jashpur and, as such, I do not find any illegality or arbitrariness in the impugned order which warrants interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this petition. The same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if