Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 1158 (CHH)

PRAYAS BAKRE v. VISHAL AGRAWAL

CRMP/1517/2019 · 2026-03-31

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1517 of 2019 1 - Prayas Bakre S/o Late Shri U.R. Bakre Aged About 50 Years Occupation- Patwari, R/o Kasturba Nagar, Police Station- Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Hiralal Dewangan S/o Late Shri P. L. Dewangan Aged About 59 Years Occupation- Revenue Inspector, R/o Near Minakshi Kirana Store, Om Zone, Shubham Vihar, Mangla, Police Station- Civil Line, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Vishal Agrawal S/o Hanuman Prasad Agrawal Aged About 38 Years R/o Naya Sarkanda, Rai Sahab Banwarilal Premises, Sarkanda, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pawan Kumar Agrawal S/o Rai Sahab Banwarilal Aged About 68 Years R/o Naya Sarkanda, Rai Sahab Banwarilal Premises, Sarkanda, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Krishna Kumar Agrawal S/o Pawan Kumar Agrawal Aged About 68 Years R/o Naya Sarkanda, Rai Sahab Banwarilal Premises, Sarkanda, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dev Singh Uike S/o Late Shri Laxman Uike Aged About 50 Years Occupation- Tahsildar, R/o Infront Of Patwari Training Centre Mangla, Police Station- Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None For Respondent No.4 Mr. Rudrapratap Dubey, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.04.01 17:59:22 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 01/04/2026 1. The present CRMP under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed against the order dated 11.10.2018 passed by the JMFC, Bilaspur (CG) in Complaint Case No.78/2018 whereby charges under section 323/34 have been framed against the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.4 has informed that the trial is currently going on. 3. Since the petition was filed against the framing of charge and the trial is going on, the petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present CRMP stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai