Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010699982018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 33747/2018 Between:
1. D.VENKAT REDDY, S/O.VENKATA RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 5-57, AMMAVARIPALLI, PENUKONDA, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LAND ACQUISITION) DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR 1ST FLOOR, SRI SHIVA COMPLEX, FUNTIMES CLUB ROAD, TEACHERS COLONY VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMLAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PENUKONDA (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. KIA MOTORS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, AMMAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in acquiring the land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.347-1C of Yerramanchi Village, Penukonda Mandal, Anantapur District, without paying the compensation or without allotting alternate land as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and violation Article 14 and 300-A of Indian Constitution and further direct the Respondents not to proceed with development activities in the petitioners land without paying the compensation and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to proceed with development activities in the petitioners land to an extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.347-1C of Yerramanchi Village, Penukonda Mandal, Anantapur District, without paying the compensation pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order date dt. 27.09.2018 in IA No.1 of 2018 in WPNo.33747 of 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. A JAYANTHI
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri J.V.Shiva Sai, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.04.2026 rsd
4
59 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 33747/2018
Date: 23.04.2026 rsd