APHC010305802019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. SHAIK NAGURBI, W/O. MASTANVALI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK MASTANVALI, S/O. MASTAN, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through ACP, West Division, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to set aside the order of court of Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, in Crl.MP No 1013 of 2018 in SC No 240/2018 dated 27/05/2019 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of (38) days in representing the Crl.Rc. No. OF 2019 and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1188/2019 SHAIK NAGURBI, W/O. MASTANVALI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA SHAIK MASTANVALI, S/O. MASTAN, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through ACP, West Division, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the tated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to set aside the order of court of Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, in Crl.MP No 1013 of 2018 in SC No 240/2018 dated 27/05/2019 and pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of (38) days in representing the Crl.Rc. No. OF IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA SHAIK NAGURBI, W/O. MASTANVALI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA SHAIK MASTANVALI, S/O. MASTAN, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O. PONDHUGULA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through ACP, West Division, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the tated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to set aside the order of court of Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, in Crl.MP No Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of (38) days in representing the Crl.Rc. No. OF IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioners in S.C. No. 240/2018 on the file of the Court Of Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1188/2019 JUDGMENT: When the matter was taken up for hearing, the web page record shows that the case against the petitioner in S.C. No. 240 of 2018, on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, had been disposed of on 05.12.2023. 2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance. 3. Be that as it may, this Court is of the view that the impugned order does not warrant interference in the present revision. 4. Recording the same, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.04.2026. KKV 28 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1188/2019 Dt.21.04.2026 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: Crl.R.C.No.1188 of 2019 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 21.04.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide separate judgment) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV