APHC010628172018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE No.2375 of 2018 Between: 1. AKKILAGUNTA VENKAMMA, W/O LATE A. YESOBU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE & L.H. WORKED AS NMR SWEEPER AT NAGARA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, NAIDUPETA, R/O D.NO. 6-6-248, JAIHIND COLONY, L.A. SAGARAM, (NAIDUPETA) NAIDUPEA, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G. CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY, THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NAIDUPET NAGARA PANCHAYAT, NAIDUPETA S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT 524 125. 2. SRI K. KANNA BABU, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, GORENTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522001. 3. SRI KARIKAL VALAVAN, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522 020. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V RAVI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE No.2375 of 2018 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner complaining non-compliance with the order dated 14.06.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16848 of 2018 by the respondents/contemnors. 2. Today, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 produced a copy of the order passed in Diary No.38532 of 2018, which is filed by the Municipal Commissioner of Naidupeta Nagara Panchayat against the aforesaid order and tagged along with SLP (C) No.21954 of 2018, to show that the Supreme Court has granted stay of the present contempt proceedings. Copy of the same is also furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, as an order of stay is granted against the contempt proceedings by the Supreme Court, this contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh contempt case after the stay is vacated by the Supreme Court or after the matter before the Supreme Court is disposed of in her favour. Presence of the respondents stands dispensed with. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY ______________________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 06.04.2026 IBL 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE No.2375 of 2018 Dt: 06.04.2026 IBL