Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RSA No.184 of 2018 1) Akash Das ..... Appellants 2) Ashish Ku.das 3) Debendrea Naik Represented by Adv. - None -versus- Subash Ch.Naik ..... Respondent Represented by Adv. – Ms. Pratyusha Naidu, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 24.03.2026 Order No. 08. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. None appears from the side of the appellants. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 4. In the previous order dated 20.02.2026, it was clarified that, no adjournment shall be given to the appellants on the next date, i.e., today. But, today none is also present on behalf of the appellants. 5. When, none is present on behalf of the appellants to prosecute the appeal, the learned counsel for the respondent is present and when the previous order dated 20.02.2026, it was specifically indicated that, no adjournment shall be given to the appellants on the next date. Today, due to the absence of the appellants and their learned counsel it shows that, they(appellants) are not interested to pursue the appeal further. Hence, the Page 2 of 2. appeal is dismissed for the default of the appellants under Order-41, Rule-17 of the C.P.C., 1908. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Jagabandhu Designation: Personal Assistant