Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2018 DAILYLAW 915 (ORI)

LINGARAJ SAMAL v. THE STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ODISHA,BBSR

WP(C)/14641/2018 · 2026-03-23

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14641 of 2018 Lingaraj Samal …. Petitioner Mr. Harekrushna Dash, Advocate -versus- The State Commission for Women Odisha, Bhubaneswar and another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 23.03.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 05. 1. The matter has been listed under the heading of “For referral to the Special Mediation Drive 2.0- Mediation for the Nation”. 2. The matter was presented before this Court on 08.08.2018 and was listed on 27.11.2018 before the Coordinate Bench, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned. Thereafter, for the last more than seven years the matter has not been listed. None had appeared for the petitioner when the matter was listed and taken up on 12.03.2026. The Registry has intimated the order dated 12.03.2026 to the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel has responded and appears in Court. 3. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which states thus: “The matte was already settle between the parties. So the matter become infructuous. So the petitioner does not want to proceed further. Therefore the matter may kindly be permit to withdraw.” (sic) The memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 4. In view of the above, the writ application stands disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh