Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2018 DAILYLAW 899 (ORI)

MANOJ KUMAR BEHERA v. ZONAL MANAGER UCO BANK

WP(C)/13696/2018 · 2026-04-15

Murahari Sri Raman

Writ Petition (Civil)body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) No.13696 of 2018 ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.13696 of 2018 In the matter of an Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 *** Manoj Kumar Behera Aged about 31 years Son of Sri Dibakar Behera Village: Brahmeswarpatna P.O.: BRIT Colony (Bargarh) Bhubaneswar, District: Khurda Presently working on Daily Wage At: Suryanagar Branch of UCO Bank Bhubaneswar. … Petitioner -VERSUS- 1. UCO Bank, represented by The Zonal Manager, UCO Bank, Zonal Office, C-2, Ashoka Nagar Bhubaneswar-751009 2. The General Manager (Personnel Services Department) UCO Bank, Head Office No.2, 3-4 D.D. Block, Sector-1 Salt Lake, Kolkata-700064 … Opposite parties Counsel appeared for the parties: For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Nath Panda, Advocate W.P.(C) No.13696 of 2018 For the Opposite parties : Mr. Sunil Kumar Swain, Advocate P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Date of Hearing : 13.03.2026 :: Date of Order : 15.04.2026 O R D E R The petitioner, working in the Branch of UCO Bank being paid daily wage craving for regularisation in service in the post of Housekeeper-cum-Peon/Peon, filed this writ petition craving for grant of following relief(s): “Under the above stated facts and circumstances, the Petitioner sincerely prays the Hon’ble Court to be graciously pleased to direct the Opposite Party-Bank to regularize his service as House Keeper-cum-Peon/Peon at any of the Branches of the Bank in the Zone and oblige. And/or pass such further order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of your kindness the Petitioner is duty bound shall ever pray.” 2. This writ petition is tagged to W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018 and came up for hearing on 13.03.2026. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties that issue involved in this writ W.P.(C) No.13696 of 2018 petition is identical to the matter in the said writ petition. It is conceded by the learned counsel for both sides that the result of said writ petition [W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018] would abide this writ petition. 3. Hearing of W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018 being concluded on 13.03.2026, the same is kept reserved for preparation of Order and the same is pronounced today (15.04.2026) in open Court. The present matter is disposed of along with the said writ petition today. 4. In view of the above noted submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the instant writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the Order pronounced today (15.04.2026) in W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018. The opposite parties are required to examine the factual similarity between the petitioner in the instant writ petition with that of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018 and in view of discussions made and taking note of decisions referred to therein the representation dated 26.04.2018 of the instant writ petitioner shall be disposed of. The entire exercise of consideration of the grievance of the petitioner for regularization/absorption in service shall be completed within a period of three months from today. Consequently, the opposite parties-Bank is directed to act in terms of the order passed in W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2018. Pending Interlocutory Applications, W.P.(C) No.13696 of 2018 if any, shall stand disposed of. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. (MURAHARI SRI RAMAN) JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 15th April, 2026//Aswini/Bichi SETHY Designation: Personal Assistant (Secretary-in-charge) COURT, CUTTACK Signature Not Verified