Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2018 DAILYLAW 885 (ORI)

CHANDANA MANDAL v. TAPAN KUMAR MANDAL

WP(C)/9892/2018 · 2026-04-06

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9892 of 2018 Chandana Mandal …. Petitioner Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate -versus- Tapan Kumar Mandal …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 06.04.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 04. 1. The matter was passed over being mentioned on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner by Mr. Abhijit Mohanty, learned counsel. 2. On 09.03.2026, the following order was passed: “1. The matter has been listed under the heading of “For referral to the Special Mediation Drive 2.0- Mediation for the Nation”. 2. The matter was presented before this Court on 08.06.2018. On 19.06.2017, the matter was listed before the Coordinate Bench and since then for the last seven years, it has not been listed. 3. Today, when the matter is called, adjournment is sought for on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain instruction. 4. The matter shall be listed in the week commencing 06.04.2026. The matter will retain its position in the list as is today.” 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner files memo of date which states thus: “That in the instant case there is no instructions due to communication gap of the petitioner. And, hence this memo has been filed for not pressed of the above writ petition.” The memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 4. Apparently, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara to be kept in the records of C.P. No.204 of 2017. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge jyostna