Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.11972 of 2018
Basanti Sahoo and another …. Petitioners
Represented By Adv.- None
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opp. Parties
Represented By Adv.- Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Order No.
ORDER 20.03.2026 (Hybrid mode)
02.
1. Heard Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate for the opposite parties.
2. None appears for the petitioners on call, though the names of two counsels have been reflected in the cause list.
3. Aggrieved by the order dated 10.04.2018 passed by the Tahasildar, Kujanga in Mutation Misc. Case No.43/2018 arising out of R.S.A. No.300/2002 (Maheswar Sahoo -Vrs.- State of Odisha and others), the petitioners filed this writ petition on 10.07.2018.
4. Mr. Debaraj Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate for the opposite parties submitted that person aggrieved by an order of such correction of the Record of
Rights by the Tahasildar, he/she has a remedy to prefer an appeal before the Sub-Collector as provided under Rule 42 of the Odisha Survey Settlement Rules, 1962.
5. It is seen that from the date of filing of this writ petition, the petitioners did not take any step to move their application and probability the petitioners are aware of the fact that they have appropriate remedy under the law and rules in force, as such, they do not move this writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak), Judge
Rabindra
Designation: Personal Assistant