SUBRATA KUMAR ROY v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.MD,ROURKELA
WP(C)/5622/2018 · 2026-02-19
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2018
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 877 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2018 DAILYLAW 877 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5622 of 2018
Subrata Kumar Roy
….
Petitioner None
-versus- Steel Authority of India Ltd., Md, Rourkela & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties Mr. B.P. Tripathy, Sr. Adv. for O.P.1 to 3
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 19.02.2026
03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was taken up. Heard Mr. B.P. Tripathy, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3.
3. It is found that against an order directing eviction from the quarter, the Writ Petition was filed with passing of an interim order on 17.04.2018. Taking into account the age of the Petitioner so mentioned in the Writ Petition, this Court is of the view that with efflux of time, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
5. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge