Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5591 (PNJ)

SUNIL JAIN AND OTHERS v. SAURAB JAIN

CRM-M/24019/2018 · 2026-09-02

Vikram Aggarwal

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24019-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 Sunil Jain and others ………Petitioners Versus Saurab Jain ..….Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the parties submit that on account of a compromise having been arrived at between them, the complaint, summoning order and the order passed by the Revisional Court, stand quashed vide order dated 25.08.2026 passed by this Court in CRM-M-25006-2024 titled as `Rishab Jain and others Vs. State of Punjab and another’. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that under the circumstances, the petitioners do not wish to pursue the instant petition and they may be permitted to withdraw the same. DALBIR SINGH 2026.09.03 18.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24019-2018 (O&M) -2- In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 02.09.2026 ds Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DALBIR SINGH 2026.09.03 18.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document