Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5575 (PNJ)

RAMPHAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/42193/2026 · 2026-08-18

Alok Jain

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (143) RAMPHAL SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. complaint dated 11.10.2018 and the impugned summoning order dated 02.04.2026, whereby the petitioners have been summoned to stand trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323 506 of the IPC, read with Section 34 of the IPC. 2. the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail an appropriate alternative remedy in is further submitted that, in case the petitioners file a revision petition, the issue of limitation may be kept open to be adjudicated upon by the Court of competent jurisdiction. 3. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits of the case. 5. counsel for the petitioners and shall n expression of opinion by this Court. 6. August 18, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RAMPHAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the complaint dated 11.10.2018 and the impugned summoning order dated 02.04.2026, whereby the petitioners have been summoned to stand trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323 506 of the IPC, read with Section 34 of the IPC. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail an appropriate alternative remedy in is further submitted that, in case the petitioners file a revision petition, the issue of limitation may be kept open to be adjudicated upon by the Court of competent jurisdiction. In view of the above, the present petition i withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty has been granted only at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and shall not be construed as any direction or expression of opinion by this Court. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. August 18, 2026 speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-42193-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 18.08.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the complaint dated 11.10.2018 and the impugned summoning order dated 02.04.2026, whereby the petitioners have been summoned to stand trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 341 and 506 of the IPC, read with Section 34 of the IPC. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail an appropriate alternative remedy in accordance with law. It is further submitted that, in case the petitioners file a revision petition, the issue of limitation may be kept open to be adjudicated upon by the Court of In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion The liberty has been granted only at the request of learned ot be construed as any direction or Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 18.08.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the complaint dated 11.10.2018 and the impugned summoning order dated 02.04.2026, whereby the petitioners have been summoned to stand trial for , 325, 341 and After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with accordance with law. It is further submitted that, in case the petitioners file a revision petition, the issue of limitation may be kept open to be adjudicated upon by the Court of s dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion The liberty has been granted only at the request of learned ot be construed as any direction or MANJU 2026.08.21 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document