Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5547 (PNJ)

KANWALJIT SINGH SANDHU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/14595/2018 · 2026-07-27

Sanjay Vashisth

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-14595-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CRM-M-14595-2018 Decided on : 27.07.2026 Kanwaljit Singh Sandhu . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Simran Jit Singh Virk, Advocate for Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG Punjab **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 64 dated 01.09.2010 titled as Ashwani Kumar vs. Sandhu Poultry Research & Breeding Farm etc. pending in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhuri and notice/charge dated 20.11.2012 qua the petitioner and order dated 20.11.2012 whereby the application for discharge filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhuri and order dated 17.02.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite making of the best efforts, none has come forward on behalf of the petitioner. REENA 2026.07.28 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-14595-2018 3. This Court has noticed that the present quashing petition is lying pending for more than a period of 08 years, with interim stay of proceedings, qua the petitioner. In view of the difficulty expressed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, petition is disposed of, as same is not being prosecuted. However, liberty is granted to seek revival by moving appropriate application within next eight weeks period, if learned counsel for the petitioner has ever succeeded to contact his client. 4. Disposed of for want of prosecution. 5. Let copy of the order be forwarded to the trial Court concerned. July 27, 2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No REENA 2026.07.28 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh