208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26113-2018 Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Gurseb Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Rahul Tanwar, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Hardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned answer key (Annexure P-3) colly of HTET TGT Physical Education held in December, 2017 qua question No.33, 132, 121 of Set-D and question No.98 of Set-B and the same questions in other sets also having different serial number being wrong and incorrect. Further, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the result of the petitioners by awarding them 03 marks for their questions as they have attempted the same correctly and also to direct respondent No.2 to allow the petitioner to participate in selection process for the post of TGT Physical Education in pursuance to advertisement No.3/2015 (Annexure P-1). 2. On 10.10.2018, the following order was passed:- NEHA 2026.07.23 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-26113-2018 -2- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have participated in the examination for the post of TGT Physical Education in their different categories which i.e. petitioner No.1 is in SC category, petitioner No.2 in BCA category and petitioner No.3 in BCB category. The petitioners are successfully cleared the written examination but at the time of scrutiny of their documents, they have been treated ineligible as they have not clarified the HTET examination. Two of the petitioners have filed their objections in response to the answer key but the same has not been considered. Though the same are right as per Annexure P-4. The petitioners apprehends that as their HTET examination is cleared because of the wrong answer key so they will not be called for the interviews. Notice of motion for 21.01.2019. In the meantime, petitioner shall be allowed for interview provisionally if any interview are called and his result be kept in the sealed cover.” 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.3-Board submits that the objection regarding question No.98 of Set-B of HTET TGT Physical Education was referred to the expert committee thrice and the answer in question is found to be correct. He further submits that the respondent-Board would consider the objection made by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instructions. 5. It appears that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present writ petition. NEHA 2026.07.23 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-26113-2018 -3- 6. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 22.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.23 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh