CRM-M-30401 IN THE HIGH COURT OF (308) AMAN TAYAL AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent proceedings ema 11.03.2026 (Annexure P 2. This Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to of the compromise. 30401-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 21.07.2026 AMAN TAYAL AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness of the compromise. PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-30401-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.07.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent nating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated This Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and send his report qua the genuineness AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.21 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-30401 3. CRM-M-30401 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat and got their statements recorded. On the basis of th has submitted report dated 07.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as coun have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P the petitioners. 21.07.2026 Amit Sharma 30401-2026 (O&M) (2) Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 07.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as coun have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC etition is allowed and FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat and got their statements e statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 07.07.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. down by the Full Bench judgment of this Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC etition is allowed and FIR No.1357 dated 04.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 34, 379, 506 of IPC at Police Station Panipat City, District Panipat and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-2), are quashed qua (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.21 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.