Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2018 DAILYLAW 5392 (PNJ)

SANTOKH SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/21887/2018 · 2026-07-07

Namit Kumar

body2018

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-21887-2018 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Santokh Singh State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: - NAMIT KUMAR 1. filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated P-1), whereby quashing order dated for life out of the petitioner’s pension order dated 12.07.2018 (Annexure P years in the petitio 2. 7 consecutive dates of hearing i.e. 11.12.2019, 25.07.2022, 23.01.2023 & 2018 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Santokh Singh Versus State of Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.S.Hira, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated , whereby a charge-sheet has been issued to him a quashing order dated 09.04.2015 (Annexure P for life out of the petitioner’s pension has been ordered and for quashing order dated 12.07.2018 (Annexure P-4), whereby 10% deduction for five years in the petitioner’s pension has been ordered. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last 7 consecutive dates of hearing i.e. 20.03.2019, 20.05.2019, 29.08.2019, 11.12.2019, 25.07.2022, 23.01.2023 & 11.03.2024. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21887-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5. invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 24.05.2013 (Annexure sheet has been issued to him after retirement; for 09.04.2015 (Annexure P-3), whereby 10% deduction has been ordered and for quashing 4), whereby 10% deduction for five ner’s pension has been ordered. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last 20.03.2019, 20.05.2019, 29.08.2019, 11.03.2024. Even today also, the invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India (Annexure fter retirement; for 3), whereby 10% deduction has been ordered and for quashing 4), whereby 10% deduction for five There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last 20.03.2019, 20.05.2019, 29.08.2019, Even today also, the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-21887-2018 (O&M) position is the same. the present petition. 3. 07.07.2026 Vimal 2018 (O&M) (2) n is the same. It appears that the petitioner the present petition. Dismissed for non prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s not interested to pursue VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.